Geology of the Rosen Ore Field

A Late Cretaceous volcanic edifice, a syenite ring pluton, and a dense fracture network — the framework that placed copper within reach of Chalcolithic hands.

Regional Geological Setting

Source: Sillitoe et al. (2020), Tzankova (2023), Bogdanov (1987).

Tectonic framework

The Rosen ore field lies in the East Srednogorie segment of the Carpathian-Balkan calc-alkaline volcano-plutonic arc. This arc formed during the Late Cretaceous as a result of subduction and extreme slab rollback along the closing Tethys margin. The mineralization at Rosen formed during an end-stage interval of extreme slab rollback and intra-arc rifting, which farther east gave rise to seafloor spreading in the Western Black Sea basin (Sillitoe et al. 2020).

The resulting submarine volcano-sedimentary rift basin is dominated by intermediate to mafic shoshonitic to ultrapotassic volcanism, with subsidiary gabbro to syenite intrusion.

The Burgas ore region — four ore fields

Copper ore deposits in SE Bulgaria are associated with four Late Cretaceous volcano-plutonic centers, grouped into four ore fields (Tzankova 2023, after Bogdanov 1987):

Ore field Type Mineralization
Rosen Vein copper-molybdenum (cobalt-bearing) Predominantly chalcopyrite; less molybdenite ore, magnetite, cobalt-bearing pyrite
Varli Bryag Vein copper Chalcopyrite-pyrite mineralization; specularite
Zidarovo Vein copper-polymetallic Gold-silver, bismuth, galena-sphalerite
Bakadzhik Vein copper-polymetallic Gold-silver, bismuth, galena-sphalerite

The Zidarovo and Bakadzhik fields do not carry the molybdenum and cobalt-bearing pyrite mineralization typical of Rosen.

Host rocks

The main pluton rock varieties are syenites and monzonites, which intruded into trachyandesite and andesite volcanic rocks. Numerous dykes of the same composition cut across these rocks. The ore veins are of hydrothermal hypabyssal origin (Bogdanov 1987; Popov et al. 1993).

The Rosen ore field

Geochemical context

Geochemical maps of the Burgas ore region show the highest zinc anomalies repeating lead anomalies in the southern part. Copper anomalies have a smaller areal presence but a distribution almost identical to Pb and Zn, located around separate volcanic-plutonic centers. Nickel anomalies in the SE part are less frequent but more contrasting. Tin anomalies are spatially correlated with the ore fields (Boyadzhiev et al. 2012).

Key references for this section

Rosen Ore Field — IOCG Deposit Model

Source: Sillitoe et al. (2020), Economic Geology 115(3): 481–488 (the definitive deposit-model paper), supplemented by Tzankova (2023) and Bogdanov (1987).

Classification

The Rosen copper veins are recognized for the first time as an iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) district (Sillitoe et al. 2020). The mineralogical and compositional features are:

A subsidiary granitophile signature accompanies the characteristic siderophile IOCG suite — a feature also recognized recently at the giant Olympic Dam deposit (South Australia) and elsewhere.

The Rosen pluton and vein geometry

Paragenesis (mineralization sequence)

Two successive stages of endogenous mineral formation (Bogdanov 1987; Sillitoe et al. 2020):

  1. Early pegmatoidal, calcic-potassic assemblage.
  2. Predominant magnetite (including the mushketovite variety), chlorite, and carbonates — plus quartz, chalcopyrite, pyrite, and numerous other metallic minerals.

The detailed mineral associations of the single pulsating ore-forming process (Bogdanov 1987, p. 276):

  1. apatite-feldspar
  2. magnetite-scheelite
  3. cobalt-bearing quartz-pyrite
  4. hematite
  5. quartz-molybdenite
  6. chalcopyrite-pyrite
  7. quartz-magnetite
  8. quartz-specularite
  9. ankerite-dolomite
  10. calcite
  11. quartz-chalcedony

Fluid conditions

Vein-type deposits formed by relatively high-temperature fluids: 320–365 °C. Only one pulsating ore-forming process has been recognized (Bogdanov 1987).

Geochemical signature

An unusual Fe-Cu-Au-Mo-Co-Ni-U-light rare earth element (LREE)-W-Bi-Zn-Pb association. The close correlation between Fe, Cu, U, and LREEs is evident even in the flotation tailings (Sillitoe et al. 2020).

REE note: Tzankova (2023) reported microinclusions with high P, La, Ce, Sr, Y, and U in malachite from the Propadnala Voda deposit, raising the question of possible REE mineralization in that area. Florencite-(Ce) (first find in Bulgaria; Kunov et al. 1992) and the APS minerals (svanbergite, woodhouseite, alunite) reflect the LREE-bearing nature of the system.

Age

Mineral count

More than 60 hypogene and 20 supergene minerals have been discovered and described in the Rosen ore field (Bogdanov 1987; Tzankova 2023). See 04-minerals/mineral-list.md.

Oxidation & supergene zone

Minerals from the oxidation zone and secondary sulfide enrichment are distributed in the subsurface parts of the ore veins down to 15–20 m depth (Bogdanov 1987):

Key references for this section

Deposits & Mines of the Rosen Ore Field

The five named deposits of the Rosen ore field, in NW–SE occurrence (Tzankova 2023, after Bogdanov 1987). Alternate names from mindat and the literature are reconciled here.

Mindat locality record

Field Value
Mindat Locality ID 25109
Long-form identifier mindat:1:2:25109:6
Name Rosen ore field
Other names Rossen ore field
Local name Росен, Община Созопол, Област Бургас, България
Type Ore Field (Abandoned) — last checked 2022
Coordinates (WGS84) 42°22′59″N, 27°34′0″E (42.38333, 27.56667)
GeoHash sxe9579kv
Köppen climate Cfa — humid subtropical

Mindat URL: https://www.mindat.org/loc-25109.html


The five deposits (NW → SE)

1. Propadnala Voda (a.k.a. Cherveno Zname / “Red Flag”)

2. Sarneshko Kladenche (Surneshko Kladenche)

3. Meden Rid (Bakarlak / Bakarlaka)

4. Korucheshme (Kyumyurlaka / Stahanov)

5. Rosen (at Atia)


Other sub-localities listed by mindat

Naming caveat

The mindat mineral list notes it “does not claim to be a complete list.” Spellings vary across Bulgarian, Turkish-derived, and transliterated forms (e.g. Rossen/Rosen, Surneshko/Sarneshko, Červeno Zname/Cherveno zname, Propadnala Voda/Woda). Where sources disagree, the Bulgarian standard form is preferred and alternates noted.

See also

See the pluton & veins on the 3D map